I’ve been getting a lot of … comments … of late about my version of “retirement.”
I heard it both a couple of weeks back speaking at an event sponsored by The Standard—and again last week at the NAPA DC Fly-In Forum—that I was setting a poor example for retirement aspirations (all good-natured, and generally followed by a quick comment that they were glad to see me nonetheless). So much for long walks on the beach or reading in a rocking chair, I suppose. But it’s my first “go” at retirement, after all—no practice rounds (even my vacations over the years have been a bit “busy”) beyond the “space” provided by COVID’s lockdowns.
That said, my days are definitely different now. And, though it’s
perhaps not apparent from the content I (still) produce in any given
week (blame the plaintiffs’ bar—if they’d quit suing, I’d have less to
write about), I’m pleased to report that I’m (beginning) to ease into
new daily patterns; (more) time on the treadmill, actually reading books
that have nothing to do with retirement plans/ERISA (or even reality),
planning trips, actually putting a bucket list to paper, and yes—even
the occasional afternoon nap.
The shift is, admittedly, subtle (my wife would tell you it’s still largely non-existent). But there’s a definite shift in focus from where I’m sitting (albeit not yet in a rocking chair).
To that end, I recently had the opportunity to listen in on a webcast featuring a good friend of mine, Jeanne Thompson, who is now mapping out her own version of “retirement.” Now, I’ve long appreciated Jeanne’s talents for data analysis (and, more significantly, her ability to convey the potential impact and import of that data in a way that “normal” people can grasp)—and on this particular webcast she crafted a perspective on life that mirrored the markets—with both bull and bear passages, but also life choices—as a series of asset allocation decisions. And, as with investing, how the different “markets” of one’s life/career can be influenced by, or sometimes run counter to prevailing forces.
As asset allocation traditionally differentiates between stocks, bonds and cash, Jeanne breaks life down into three major elements: sleep, life and work. Those are broad swathes of existence, to be sure, but when you are talking about something like work/life balance, it’s not a bad place to start from. And, as she graphed out her career experience on that webinar, it was easy to see how life events—promotion to a new position, marriage, the arrival of children, and the “emptying” of that nest were reflected in those allocations of time.
In life, as with the markets, there are external influences that force shifts in those allocations. And yet, we have—or should have—some sense of the allocation we believe to be desirable to meet our goals. And, if we’re mindful of that compass, we know that adjustments are appropriate from time to time—and that if those adjustments are ignored—well, the results can be…unfortunate.
But, as with any asset allocation decision, it starts with knowing your goals, your time frame(s) to achieve them, an appreciation for the cognizance of the surrounding environment(s), and a commitment to rebalance over time, as appropriate.
And you don’t even have to wait till “retirement” to do so.
- Nevin E. Adams, JD
No comments:
Post a Comment