Well, it seemed that someone was always pulling those levers, and no, not because of any actual fire—but rather because some hapless soul had been pressured to create a nuisance, but more commonly just because some upper classman was looking to avoid a test for which they weren’t prepared, or wanted to get outside and enjoy the fresh air.
Initially these emergency calls got the expected response, and we all dutifully filed down the stairs and out to our designated areas. And, sure enough, by the time the building was evacuated, the premises sufficiently investigated, and the student body returned to our respective classrooms—well, it left little time for actual instruction, for a period, at least. And then afterwards we’d get the loudspeaker reminder that these were “for emergency only.”
Last week the Wall Street Journal ran a piece titled, “Should You Tap Retirement Funds in a Crisis? Increasingly, People Say Yes”, and then proceeded to outline the circumstances of several individuals who have, following a variety of hardships imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic (and subsequent economic shutdown) tapped into their 401(k) for some financial sustenance. The article[ii] proceeded not only to chronicle the recent legislation that has loosened the restrictions on loans, and created a whole new category of distributions to help stave off financial catastrophe in the wake of the pandemic, but that has, ever since Hurricane Katrina, become something of a pattern of relief—well, pretty much every time there is some kind of regional calamity.
Indeed, the lowering of the barriers to a pre-retirement withdrawal of these ostensibly for retirement funds has become so routine that it seems that every time there is a wildfire, flood, tornado, hurricane, earthquake, or natural disaster that impacts more than a local neighborhood, our industry queues up for the inevitable relief announcement like a Pavlovian pack.
Don’t get me wrong. I am pleased and proud of a system that, at a time of severe and extraordinary financial hardships, can provide an essential financial lifeline. Moreover, unlike the mammoth amounts of government aid and assistance already targeted, these funds provide relief that is literally funded by the very pockets of those impacted by the disaster.[iii]
And yet, while appreciating both the need and positive potential impact that these programs can have, as we look ahead to the future they’re “borrowing” from, one can’t help but hope that most won’t be forced to. Indeed, the WSJ article notes that from late March through May 8, (just) 1.5% of eligible people with 401(k) accounts handled by Fidelity Investments took some money out, while Empower Retirement notes that (only) about 1% of 401(k) savers in plans it administers that allow the withdrawals took money out through May 31, while Alight Solutions LLC, puts the figure at 1.2%, though it notes that more than half of those withdrew $100,000 (or their whole balance if it was less than that). Similarly, a recent survey of the ASPPA TPA community suggests that loan and withdrawal volumes are, in fact, largely, in line with traditional trends.[iv]
Even now, however, there are voices encouraging and enticing ostensibly COVID-impacted individuals who don’t have a financial emergency to take advantage of this new “opportunity” to pull money out of those retirement savings accounts, doubtless preying on their concerns, and—in some cases surely—greed.
Here’s hoping that individuals remember that these accounts—as with those school building fire alarms,—should be “pulled” only “in case of emergency.”
- Nevin E. Adams, JD
[ii]To
their credit, the WSJ article includes cautionary voices, noting that
pulling out retirement money now might undermine their future financial
security, that pulling that money out during volatile markets might well
be a “sell low” decision, and that encouraging withdrawals now is, at
best, a mixed message about the retirement focus of these accounts. The
title may suggest a groundswell of voices “increasingly” calling for
pre-retirement access, but even those featured in the article whose
hands have been forced by circumstances beyond their control largely
express caution and concern at having done so—and a commitment to
continued prudent preparations once their current economic turmoil ends.
[iii]Indeed,
that’s quite different from the government or employer-funded
international pension systems (Australia and Malaysia, of all places)
cited in the WSJ article as now permitting pre-retirement access.
[iv]The
WSJ article also reports that retirement savings programs sponsored by
California, Oregon and Illinois reported increases in distributions
following state shutdowns. As of the end of May, 13.7% of IRAs that
Illinois residents funded through the state’s Illinois Secure Choice
program had been fully or partially liquidated, up from 10.7% on Jan. 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment