Showing posts with label insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insurance. Show all posts

Saturday, May 03, 2025

Designated ‘Drivers’ — 4 Lessons Learned

 Your best laid plans can quickly go awry if your beneficiaries are clueless.

For the past several months, I’ve been dealing with the disposition of my late mother’s estate. In the overall scheme of things, it is neither large, nor particularly complex. As I’ve noted before, Mom did a solid job of not only managing her finances while alive, but in terms of making sure that I (as eldest perhaps, but more specifically as executor) was aware of the various insurance policies, retirement accounts and property. 

In that respect, she was doubtless “better” than many parents in discussing such matters before her passing (though none of that happened until after my father passed). Moreover, despite their modest means, they set up a living trust back when my Dad was with us — specifically to avoid the complexities of going through probate in an effort to make it easier for us. And prior to her passing, Mom made sure I had all the account numbers and phone numbers, and we set up online access to everything — allowing me to help her manage those accounts from afar well before her passing.


That said, and despite all that preparation — there were some “bumps” along the way. Here’s what I learned.   

Lesson #1 — Make sure that you share (or get) information about insurance, retirement and property with trusted individuals/families while you are still able.

Now, for all the headlines about dead people on Social Security rolls, they were “johnny on the spot” in notifying — well, everyone — about Mom’s death. Her pension stopped — immediately — as did access to her online insurance and retirement accounts. That is, of course, a good thing from a fraud standpoint. There are miscreants aplenty who troll death notices and look for opportunities to take advantage of those situations. That said, if I hadn’t already known what accounts Mom had set up — I wouldn’t have had a clue as to how to go about the process of closing and cashing them out.

Lesson #2 — Make sure that you know WHO the designated beneficiary(ies) are for each of the insurance, retirement and properties in question.

Now I had assumed — based on prior conversations that all of Mom’s holdings were set up in the name of the trust. And, armed with account numbers, I proceeded to file claims on that basis.[i] Mind you, everybody wants an original copy of the death certificate — and that means that you have to ship it to folks via a traditional delivery service (FedEx, UPS, USPS, etc.). And, as you might expect, they also want some evidence that you are legally positioned to act on behalf of the trust (though this they will accept electronically). This all takes time.

Then I started getting mail BACK from various entities that said the trust was NOT the beneficiary (this is all via mail, so weeks are passing). Of course, when I called to inquire who WAS the beneficiary — well, they wouldn’t tell me, as my legal status of trustee mattered not (nobody talks to anybody (else) until they get the aforementioned death certificates).

Fortunately, as it turned out, Mom had designated — probably back to the time before she had the trust established — her children as beneficiaries. Being one of those, I was then able to pivot — and got a response. They wouldn’t confirm the remainder of the beneficiaries — but knowing Mom, I was pretty sure that she had named each of us as beneficiaries (she had), and so I was able to proceed with my claim (though my siblings had to proceed “individually” with theirs). 

Lesson #3 — It doesn’t “pay” to wait.

With regard to the latter, my experience was that, despite the rapid (if not immediate) cessation of access to Mom’s accounts, the notification to beneficiaries was slow (and, as noted before, via USPS). Moreover, people tend to move over time, and so the beneficiary address that was provided back in 2006 might no longer be accurate. The claim forms, when they did arrive, were bulky, confusing and intimidating — with little reference as to which account was involved, or what kind of account it was. In sum, it would have been easy to see it as junk mail. 

It didn’t help matters that, over the years, consolidation in both the insurance and retirement industries meant that those massive forms came from companies whose name didn’t match the original source (and in two cases, they now bore the same name, but not that of the original companies). As noted above, and through no fault of these companies, the addresses on file were out of date (though one managed to find its way to a nephew of a different brother — in a completely different state — and we still have NO idea how THAT happened).

More than that, my well-educated siblings struggled to make heads or tails of the options.  In their defense, you had to wade through 12 pages of “explanation” to get to those options — and then even this industry “insider” found it to be a head-scratcher. Seriously, do the people who draft these forms have a clue what plain English looks like (p.s., annuity companies really make it hard to request a straightforward lump sum)?

Lesson #4 — You can count on customer service, but only during business hours.

Now, and without exception, everyone I spoke with at the various firms was kind, understanding and helpful — in spirit, if not in what they were allowed to tell me. Much of the claims filing (except for the death certificate) could be done online. Everything — eventually — worked out. 

But if you do have a need to talk to someone at the firms, know that dealing with these matters is something that’s hard to do during “regular” business hours (the one exception — Mom’s 403(b) retirement account!). Fortunately, my “retired” status helped, but for those still working a full-time job, note that most didn’t offer 24-hour — or even evening hours — customer support. Budget your time accordingly. 

And my thanks here to all of those customer service reps who were understanding, kind and patient.

  • Nevin E. Adams, JD

Sunday, September 29, 2013

System "Upgrades"

I recently upgraded the operating system on my iPhone. Not that that would normally be a big deal—I generally try to keep such things current, despite the occasional “bumps” that inevitably come with software upgrades. But this time the upgrade wasn’t just about improving performance and fixing issues that had been identified since the last update.  No, this one not only LOOKED different, some core functions were said to work differently—and “different” in this case appeared to be a problem for a number of users.

So, before I took the “plunge,” I spent some time trying to do some research—trying to find out what kinds of improvements I could anticipate, and to better understand the complaints associated with an upgrade from which there was, apparently, no “return.” The upgrades were readily quantified (on the vendor’s website most notably), although I think it’s fair to say they had a motivation in promoting the new system. However, most seemed to be relatively unimportant in terms of how I used, or planned to use, my device. As for the problems: Well, they were equally easy to find, but harder to quantify. And, like those product ratings on any website, were from people I did not know and whose judgments I had no particular reason to trust.

Consequently, stuck between conflicting perspectives, and seeing no particular advantage in making a change, I did what most human beings do. Nothing. Until, with my current contract expiring, I realized that the upgrade was likely to be imposed on me at that point, regardless of my preferences.

On October 1, the public marketplaces (formerly known as connectors or exchanges) associated with the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) will begin to come online—in various phases and, from what one can discern from published reports and official updates, in various states of readiness. The advantages have been outlined, as have the potential pitfalls. Doubtless the experiences will be as varied as the experience(s) and expectation(s) of the individuals involved.

However, it’s hardly a new idea. Back in 1980 the conservative Heritage Foundation began advocating that the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program (FEHBP—a marketplace for multiple insurers and scores of plan options) become a model for expansion of health coverage through an individual mandate. Today, simply telling those in Washington, DC, that “the marketplaces are just a version of FEHBP” brings an immediate understanding of the concept.

A year ago, EBRI published an Issue Brief that outlined the issues related to private health insurance exchanges, possible structures of an exchange, funding, as well as the pros, cons, and uncertainties to employers of adopting them. That report contained a summary of recent surveys on employer attitudes, as well as some changes that employers have made to other benefits that might serve as historical precedents for a move to some type of defined contribution health benefits approach. It is a report that provides both current analysis alongside a historical perspective—a resource for those looking to better understand and plan for the potential changes ahead.¹

That said, when Paul Fronstin, EBRI’s director of Health Research and the EBRI Center for Research on Health Benefits Innovation, updates the information in the future, he may well call them marketplaces, unless the name “upgrades” again in the weeks ahead!

Nevin E. Adams, JD

¹ See “Private Health Insurance Exchanges and Defined Contribution Health Plans: Is It Déjà Vu All Over Again?” online here.

You can find a catalogue of recent EBRI research on PPACA and its potential impact on employment-based health benefits online here.